RE: Federal Judge Orders White House To Temporarily Restore Press Access To Jim Acosta
November 17, 2018 at 9:42 pm
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2018 at 9:49 pm by RoadRunner79.)
(November 17, 2018 at 9:49 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Quote:Such liberal interpretation of the constitution can lead to much of what it was trying to prevent, and can be made to say most anything.
Liberal (adj): Any law, court ruling, or custom that makes you uncomfortable.
Conservative (adj): Anything that gives you the warm and fuzzy that nothing will ever, EVER change.
Boru
This doesn’t seem like the kind of rhetoric and nonsense that makes for a civil discussion.
(November 17, 2018 at 9:07 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Just as a matter of law, the executive branch is the law, so arguing that the executive branch's actions aren't a matter of law because they aren't an act of congress seems rather ill conceived.
(November 16, 2018 at 11:21 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Such liberal interpretation of the constitution can lead to much of what it was trying to prevent, and can be made to say most anything.
I resent your characterizing it as a liberal issue. It is not. Moreover I find your slippery slope argument without merit. That you may see 'liberal' concerns as threatening the end of civilization as we know it is neither reasonable nor particularly persuasive.
I think that you are using liberal in a different manner than I am. As I said, I’m not referring to political issues or affiliation.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther