(May 26, 2009 at 5:56 am)dagda Wrote: Does the grave of James count as evidence, or are we just passing that one by? What about his writings? Or maybe he was part of the grand conspiracy that faked Christ?
Evidence of that please.
(May 26, 2009 at 5:56 am)dagda Wrote: Again I say, if Christ is fake then who faked him (and maybe the disciples?), why did they bother and how did they manage to pull it off?
Did you think Hercules existed for real? It's possible to create a relgious charachter based on myths and legends. However in some myths can grain of truth be found. A Jesus which the biblical Jesus was based on is possible. I don't rule that out at all. I just want evidence of such thing and I haven't found any so far.
There were a lot of evidence of Mohammed exitence but not Jesus. Yes, they lived en separate time period. But if Jesus were so popluar and big, why didn't any one write about him during the time he lived? Either he haven't existed and is jsut a fictional charachter. Or there have been some named Jesus that was sort of the one that was later to become the one talked about in the bible.
However it's probably alot of myths that Jesus must been credited for. I think he maybe been some kind of rebel and for some people did he became somewhat of an marture. Then they talked abot him and talked about stories of him. As with all stories do they get exaggerated with time and other legends and myths did Jesus get credit for. That is a possible conclusion, but that's just a hypothosis.
- Science is not trying to create an answer like religion, it tries to find an answer.
