RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 21, 2018 at 12:33 am
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2018 at 12:37 am by Everena.)
(November 21, 2018 at 12:27 am)Bucky Ball Wrote: You know nothing about Krauss or his BOOKS or his science. He has no "argument" ... you fool.
He's not my "hero" ... in some ways he's been somewhat counter-productive ... but thanks for proving again you're a liar and a fool.
Are you sure you're not really a 13 year old Valley Girl ?
That is what you sound like, sweetie dear. (gumsnap)
Stop hitting on me. I am not interested. No means no.
And I do not give a frick about Kraus, and yes he did present a moronic, idiotic, nonsensical, atheist argument.
And I am from NorCal. SoCal sucks.
(November 21, 2018 at 12:32 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:He just copied some scientists theory from the 1930s, wrote a bunch of crap he knew he could never prove, and took the money and ran.(November 21, 2018 at 12:18 am)Everena Wrote: No, stay an atheist. Believe this whole universe just magically appeared one day for no reason from an inanimate object. That's the kind of logic that suits you well. And an elementary school teacher could explain what was wrong with Krauss's stupid argument.
That's interesting, because so far you haven't bothered to explain what's wrong with Krauss' scientific argument, and freely admit you aren't even familiar with his argument. I don't think you can present us with anyone who can explain what's wrong with Krauss' scientific argument. And that's not even assuming he's correct. Just pointing out that your bluff is as empty and hollow as the inside of your skull. If Krauss' argument is wrong, and an elementary school teacher were possessed of the right knowledge and skills, then said person could in fact show what was wrong with Krauss' argument. That this is yet another example of ignoratio elenchi, and does nothing to advance the argument that Krauss is wrong, it's just more moronic arguments for us to laugh at.
Thanks for the lulz, sweet cheeks. Got any more demonstrations of your stupidity for us to laugh at? Anything that actually shows Krauss' science is wrong? Any actual elementary school teachers to put your boast to the test?
I've got a better idea. Why don't you prove even basic competence by summarizing just what Krauss' scientific argument actually is?