DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Angrboda]

That's interesting, because so far you haven't bothered to explain what's wrong with Krauss' scientific argument, and freely admit you aren't even familiar with his argument.  I don't think you can present us with anyone who can explain what's wrong with Krauss' scientific argument.  And that's not even assuming he's correct.  Just pointing out that your bluff is as empty and hollow as the inside of your skull.  If Krauss' argument is wrong, and an elementary school teacher were possessed of the right knowledge and skills, then said person could in fact show what was wrong with Krauss' argument.  That this is yet another example of ignoratio elenchi, and does nothing to advance the argument that Krauss is wrong, it's just more moronic arguments for us to laugh at.

Thanks for the lulz, sweet cheeks.  Got any more demonstrations of your stupidity for us to laugh at?  Anything that actually shows Krauss' science is wrong?  Any actual elementary school teachers to put your boast to the test?

I've got a better idea.  Why don't you prove even basic competence by summarizing just what Krauss' scientific argument actually is?

He just copied some scientists theory from the 1930s, wrote a bunch of crap he knew he could never prove, and took the money and ran.

Then it should be a snap for you to summarize it for us. Get to it, honey pie. Time is money, you know.

---

Great. Then you should have no problem with it either. Let's hear it. Now.

I already posted it.

Evidence or GTFO. And we're talking about his scientific thesis. Not any crap about his atheism. Nobody gives a crap about that.