RE: Evidence for ET?
November 22, 2018 at 8:23 pm
(This post was last modified: November 22, 2018 at 8:27 pm by Anomalocaris.)
It’s pursuasivelg, but not conclusively, identified.
It is dishonest to say a thing is unidentified merely because pursuasive identification does not say what you want to hear and there still appear to be wiggle room left. That elevates wishthinking and denigrates critical assessment of evidence and probability.
It is dishonest to say a thing is unidentified merely because pursuasive identification does not say what you want to hear and there still appear to be wiggle room left. That elevates wishthinking and denigrates critical assessment of evidence and probability.
