DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Abaddon_ire]

Everena: I don't believe in souls in other universes. I believe our true selves/souls are existing in superposition, here and in another universe.

Evidence for these stupid claims please.

Everena: If they can come up with a more logical explanation for how our souls inhabit this flesh and how we move to another plane of existence when we die, then I will consider it. 

No you won't because you have yet to demonstrate that there is any such thing as a soul in the first place.

"we agree on far more than we disagree on."

Everena: There are only 1.2 billion catholics in the world, not billions, and you have no idea what they individually believe. Also, you are stating church doctrine, and I have already been saved by Jesus, and been baptized.

I was born and raised catholic. You are a liar.

Everena: I already provided you with a youtuve video of him that you obviously just ignored. And yes it is in the exact same way I believe in a soul. All concepts of the human soul are pretty similiar.

No. They are not. If you are ignorant to think such a stupid idea then you are even dumber than I first thought.

You must be some lowlife loser who has nothing better to do with his life to than insult random people on the internet that you know nothing about and have never met.

And there is a blot on your karma.

No, you are just not familiar with their theory which is that the brain is merely a receiver of our conscoiusness and we are quite possibly receiving it from outside the brain.

Liar. We are familiar with that bovine claim and HOW DARE YOU PRETEND TO TELL ANYONE WHAT THEY DO OR DONT KNOW.

You are an arrogant ass.

You must be some lowlife loser who has nothing better to do with his life than to insult random people on the internet who you know nothing about, and have never met.

Really building up that karmic debt, aren't you.

Actually, it is obvious that you dont believe a word you post. Liar.

It has been their theory for 20 years and they have now proven it partially. I also already gave you a link to Hameroff discussing this exact topic. They're are also numerous videos on youtube of them discussing it together. Penrose intitially did not want to say that, and only Hameroff said it. But now they both say it-like it or not. And yes it is also mentioned in the article. The article specifically says it accomodates spiritual approaches to consciousness. Hameroff has said in many interviews that it is really MORE accomodating of the spiritual approach. Too bad for you.
https://phys.org/news/2014-01-discovery-...rates.html

BS. Read the article linked again you liar.

Wasn’t it you who in the process of revealing your ignorances, conceits and bullying personality on this website for everyone to see, said my life has no beginning, no ending, and lasts forever?  What does it matter if I waste but a little of an infinite resource?   See, I am not insulting some random person.  I am insulting you, because it is hard not to treat a person who says what you say and conduct herself how you do on this forum with anything less than the utmost of contempt.

If you cannot cannot handle reading someone else's beliefs without going into a psychotic rage over it, you should get some help.

There is no "psychotic rage" in that post. You are a liar.

Wrong. They have the only theory that has ever even been partially proven and corroborated. Neuroscientists agree with all proven science. And you know nothing about the theory that I have been following for 20 years, so stop pretending that you do. And microtubules were always the key to proving it all. And they have done that.

Liar. They have not claimed anything external to the physical brain.

Neither one of us has pushed anything on anyone.

Liar. You have been pushing your new age crap ever since you got here.

I answered people's questions and debated the topics presented.

Liar. All you have done is stamp your little feet and insist you are right. That is not answering questions, nor is it debate.

You just like to twist anything you possibly can, and insult people as much as you can, because you have no valid argument and nothing intelligent to say.

Projection. A classic case.

You know nothing. And I am sure that I am far more intelligent and well educated than you are.

There goes your karma again.

I know what microtubules are and I know why they are the key to this theory.

Demonstrate your understanding in your own words. You can't.

You know nothing and sound like the ignorant uneducated blathering fool that you are.

Poof. Your karma is fast becoming a train wreck.

You never bother to find out what the actual facts are,

Projection

and I am just forced to prove you wrong over and over again after you've once again spewed some ignorant crap.

You have proven nothing. All you have done is blare like the ignorant foghorn you are.

And didn't we already have this argument? Anyway, you lose.

I see you are familiar with pigeon chess

The only time any scientist doubted them was prior to them proving this incredibly important part of their theory in 2014. 
And yes, you can partially prove a theory when you have 20 testable predictions and you are able to prove 6 of them as they have. The other 14 predictions are still hypothesis, but NONE are refuted by anyone. Maybe you should learn to read and stop pretending you know anything. https://phys.org/news/2014-01-discovery-...rates.html  

You were clearly home schooled.

Oh and Happy Thanksgiving!

Not American nor live in America so meh.