DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Everena]

Everena: A Strawman argument is when you avoid the question that was asked and deflect by answering a different question. That is exactly what you did and you are now doing it again.

I'm finding it increasingly difficult to take your statements seriously, so I'll only respond to this portion of your reply.

Strawman Fallacy - Logically Fallacious
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tool...an_Fallacy
Substituting a person's actual position or argument with a distorted, exaggerated, or misrepresented version of the position of the argument.

---

We just popped out of nowhere in a meaningless, unguided, and un-created universe over a period of 4.54 billion years on an earth somewhere in the universe?  I'm not buying it.  The evidence points elsewhere.

This is a good example of a strawman argument. We aren't claiming that the universe just popped out of nowhere. It's entirely unclear that there ever was a literal 'nowhere' for it to have popped from. As I said, there are wonderful books on this subject that are quite accessible to the layman and should be a cakewalk for an engineer. You do want to know more, don't you?

---

The lawyer?

He has a Bachelors Degree and a Masters Degree in Earth Science and he has a Doctorate Degree in Law.

---

I'm finding it increasingly difficult to take your statements seriously, so I'll only respond to this portion of your reply.

You mean you have no answer to my question because it's a fail for atheism. Instead you are posting something that I already know. And all any of you have done is a present a strawman argument.

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man."Wikipedia