RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 28, 2018 at 9:29 pm
(This post was last modified: November 28, 2018 at 9:33 pm by Paleophyte.)
(November 28, 2018 at 9:09 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(November 28, 2018 at 8:30 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: You want to teach YOUR children contradictory views to actual, established science, you fucking go for it. Don't try to push your bullshit on everyone elses kids and try to call it fucking science.
ID is a CLAIM. Not even a scientific theory.
But, once again, it's amazing how you morons play the fucking victim or claim "conspiracy" when judgements go against YOUR agenda.
Boo -fucking - hoo. The vast majority of scientists accepts evolution because it has overwhelming supporting evidence. It is testable, verifiable, and observable. Whereas ID is accepted by some people who don't have qualifications in the required field and perhaps a handful of people who do.
I suppose you would support prayer or faith "healing" over modern medicine, too.
ID is science.
Tell it to the judge.
(November 28, 2018 at 9:18 pm)Everena Wrote:(November 28, 2018 at 8:25 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: By what definition of the term is a barnacle conscious?
Seems conscious enough:
"The sessile lifestyle of barnacles makes sexual reproduction difficult, as the organisms cannot leave their shells to mate. To facilitate genetic transfer between isolated individuals, barnacles have extraordinarily long penises. Barnacles probably have the largest penis to body size ratio of the animal kingdom.[11]
Barnacles can also reproduce through a method called spermcasting, in which the male barnacle releases his sperm into the water and females pick it up and fertilise their eggs.[13]
The Rhizocephala superorder used to be considered hermaphroditic, but it turned out that its males inject themselves into the female's body, degrading to the condition of nothing more than sperm-producing cells.[14
What does barnacle penis size have to do with consciousness?!?
He asked in horrified fascination.