Human Intelligence is an Illusion

[Angrboda]

I was simply pointing out that he was not arguing solely from a philosophical argument but using empirical support for his argument, so your claim that his presentation only consisted of philosophical argument was wrong.  You can argue about the proper interpretation of those empirical results, but they are not merely philosophical argument.

A philosophical based interpretation of experimental data is not a demonstration of "all decisions are arrived at outside the realm of conscious awareness". At least not in my book.

Fair enough. I interpreted your statement as saying that his conclusion was based solely on a priori reasoning. If that was not your meaning, then that was my mistake.