(December 26, 2018 at 7:58 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:(December 26, 2018 at 6:58 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: It was used to "distinguish." I wasn't bullying you. You just randomly start spouting nonsense about things. If you feel I haven't stated something sufficiently to your understanding of said topic, you are welcome to ask. I wasn't "cherry picking" anything and never stated it was exhaustive. That's how you have dialogue with someone. I'm more than happy to expand on something, and I don't intentionally go out of my way to "cherry pick."
That's just your opinion and it's a string of logical fallacies.
Sound familiar ?
Oh really? Which part of it was a logical fallacy?
It said in the referenced piece it was to "distinguish" (check)
You randomly spout nonsense about things (check)
You're welcome to ask me to expand on things if you feel I didn't thoroughly address something to your satisfaction. (check)
Never claimed I represented anything exhaustively (check)
Dialogue goes back and forth. At least if you hope to accomplish anything meaningful in a discussion. (check)
Didn't cherry pick anything. It was cited, and you attempted to validate yourself with the same source (check)
The first thought that comes to mind when listening to your nonsensical banter is "Derp" (check)
I don't mind when people disagree, but my hope is always to have dialogue that is friendly and constructive. You seem to want to go down a different route, so maybe go bother someone else. If not, fair enough. Have a good one.
