Is atheism a belief?

[T0 Th3 M4X]

1. Incorrect.  Validation of one thing does not automatically validate or invalidate the existence of something else.  If you subjectively attribute a name or title to someone, it doesn't mean another subject can't maintain that same name or title. 
Additionally, saying something isn't coherently defined isn't even of the ballpark of being correct.  We have dictionaries, encyclopedias that define things, including "God" or "gods."  So if you find those definitions incoherent, then it's a personal malfunction of your ability to comprehend something.  Heck, I can comprehend who "Zeus" is supposed to be, even though I don't assert any special meaning to him that dictates my own life.

2. It is defined.  See 1.  Do we need to start referencing said literature for definitions?  Maybe then we can have a definition YOU can understand.

YOU, troll,  have no coherent definition of a god. There is no coherent definition, and that is why Igtheism is a thing. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism
Christians claim they have a "timeless" "eternal" deity ... yet ascribe to it all sorts of temporal acts. THAT is incoherent. 
EVERY quality or property of their god(s) requires time. YOU have no coherent definition of any god. 

BTW, it's "not IN the ballpark", not "of the ballpark". You're in WAY over your head.

---

Not coherent to you, which makes you incoherent, not me.  If you're arguing that there's no coherent definition at all, then I would direct you to dictionaries, encyclopedias, journals, the Bible (if you're talking about the Judeo-Christian God, etc...)  Because those things define the subject(s).   That doesn't make me a troll.  It makes you inaccurate, incoherent, incorrect, and potentially ignorant.  Next.