(December 29, 2018 at 7:35 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Not coherent to you, which makes you incoherent, not me. If you're arguing that there's no coherent definition at all, then I would direct you to dictionaries, encyclopedias, journals, the Bible (if you're talking about the Judeo-Christian God, etc...) Because those things define the subject(s). That doesn't make me a troll. It makes you inaccurate, incoherent, incorrect, and potentially ignorant. Next.
Okay... sorry to step in here but...
"Not coherent to you, which makes you incoherent, not me."
This sentence? It makes no sense. Some one finding something incoherant... makes them incoherant? What?
"If you're arguing that there's no coherent definition at all, then I would direct you to dictionaries, encyclopedias, journals, the Bible (if you're talking about the Judeo-Christian God, etc...)"
Bucky is totally saying the things you're pointing to are incoherant. Bucky even gave you an example of why they found said things/examples incohernat.
That there is a description of a diety that is "Omnipotent, Omniscient and Omnipresent." which has been shown to be completely... wonky...
Since a diey with those attributes doesn't match what happens/could happen within reality.
"Because those things define the subject(s)."
Uhm... no. Some of those things simply describe said subjects. Really a Dictionary is descriptive of how words are used. Hence they keep revising them as people change what words mean.
"That doesn't make me a troll. It makes you inaccurate, incoherent, incorrect, and potentially ignorant..."
True... such things dont' necesarily make you a 'Troll'.
Your reply doesn't seem to indicate or prove that Bucky was inacurate.
Bucky's post was understandable... so they aren't incoherant.
Incorrect? Well... maybe a better counter post would help your side here?
Ignorant? Not reading anything to indicate Bucky's ignroant. Least ways about the things in this thread.
Not at work.
