I've read all these 16 pages of shit and all I saw was deflection and dodging.
Once the muslims were "cornered", the answer given was "it depends on how you interpret it!".
I've already talked to many muslims and one of the main "selling points" of their religion was exactly that their religion was devoid of ambiguity. I'll quote one of their response:
"Islam is not like christianity where every passage is left to interpretation and people can give whatever meaning they want. Islam is precise and unambiguous, it's the truth, you don't have to interpret anything, it is what it is and we even memorize the text, this is how great Allah is".
So now you tell me that even the quran is left to interpretation and its message depends on whether you see it positively or negatively?. Which one is it? Unambiguous magic book or general guidelines with free interpretation?
To me it all sounds as if you are trying to defend the undefendable. The true muslim would indeed literally follow that book and proceed to beat their women after that 3-step procedure. It is YOUR choice to see a further message and interpret it differently, such as only act if the woman beats you or to smack her with your dick, just so you can sugarcoat the savage message written in your book, but that is not written anywhere. And again, if you need to stretch your braincells in order to adapt your religion to your own inner moral thinking, then it's no longer unambiguous and precise and wondefurl and perfect as you preach.
Also, if your book is so ambiguous and freely interpretable as you say to the point that it generates such violent behaviours, brutal laws, silly practices, unless you properly interpret it, then wouldn't we be better off without islam at all? Look at the big picture, for the greater good of everyone, if islam can be properly interpreted only by a minority and everyone else is just misinterpreting it, wouldn't it be more functional and practicll to just delete it completely? Is it really worth it to keep islam at the cost of many people misinterpreting it and dispensing violence and creating chaos and terror? Is there really any point to keep it at all and not just ditch it?
That book was written by a savage for savages and is not compatible with any civilized country. How do we, ignorant and ungrateful unbelievers, know that we are better off without islam, christianity, induism or whatever religion? Because those things only create confusion, chaos, hatred, violence and what not. The only "positive" message preached by religions could be reached by simply teaching everyone basic concepts such as common sense without further mythical meaning behind them. You don't need to believe in Christ or Allah or whatever in order to understand that killing everyone is not functional, useful or natural and only brings you disadvantages in life. You don't need any religion to understand that teaming up with your fellow human can help you both reach greater results, and all these things are easily explained with practical and factual examples. Religions just needlessly complicate something that is simple at its basic level with magical bullshit that is not backed up by any factual evidence and should just disappear.
Once the muslims were "cornered", the answer given was "it depends on how you interpret it!".
I've already talked to many muslims and one of the main "selling points" of their religion was exactly that their religion was devoid of ambiguity. I'll quote one of their response:
"Islam is not like christianity where every passage is left to interpretation and people can give whatever meaning they want. Islam is precise and unambiguous, it's the truth, you don't have to interpret anything, it is what it is and we even memorize the text, this is how great Allah is".
So now you tell me that even the quran is left to interpretation and its message depends on whether you see it positively or negatively?. Which one is it? Unambiguous magic book or general guidelines with free interpretation?
To me it all sounds as if you are trying to defend the undefendable. The true muslim would indeed literally follow that book and proceed to beat their women after that 3-step procedure. It is YOUR choice to see a further message and interpret it differently, such as only act if the woman beats you or to smack her with your dick, just so you can sugarcoat the savage message written in your book, but that is not written anywhere. And again, if you need to stretch your braincells in order to adapt your religion to your own inner moral thinking, then it's no longer unambiguous and precise and wondefurl and perfect as you preach.
Also, if your book is so ambiguous and freely interpretable as you say to the point that it generates such violent behaviours, brutal laws, silly practices, unless you properly interpret it, then wouldn't we be better off without islam at all? Look at the big picture, for the greater good of everyone, if islam can be properly interpreted only by a minority and everyone else is just misinterpreting it, wouldn't it be more functional and practicll to just delete it completely? Is it really worth it to keep islam at the cost of many people misinterpreting it and dispensing violence and creating chaos and terror? Is there really any point to keep it at all and not just ditch it?
That book was written by a savage for savages and is not compatible with any civilized country. How do we, ignorant and ungrateful unbelievers, know that we are better off without islam, christianity, induism or whatever religion? Because those things only create confusion, chaos, hatred, violence and what not. The only "positive" message preached by religions could be reached by simply teaching everyone basic concepts such as common sense without further mythical meaning behind them. You don't need to believe in Christ or Allah or whatever in order to understand that killing everyone is not functional, useful or natural and only brings you disadvantages in life. You don't need any religion to understand that teaming up with your fellow human can help you both reach greater results, and all these things are easily explained with practical and factual examples. Religions just needlessly complicate something that is simple at its basic level with magical bullshit that is not backed up by any factual evidence and should just disappear.
