Christian trigger words

[Brian37]

Thomas Aquinas, who was a Christian, defined the soul as the form of the body. 

Following Aristotle, he said that every material object has both matter (hyle) and form (morphe). 

Form, in this view, is more than just shape. It includes the workings of a particular thing. So the form of the human body includes the ability to do the things that bodies do -- breath, eat, etc. A human body which couldn't do these things would in some way lack its proper form. 

Christians who follow Aquinas posit that this form is an intrinsic part of who we are. The only supernatural thing they claim about the soul is that it can be transferred after death to a different type of matter. But the form that you are, plus the matter which the form forms, is what you are. 

Therefore, the idea that a man's soul is detachable and can be transferred into a woman's body at will, or vice versa, would go against what a person's true form is. They define violence as that which opposes the flourishing of the form one has, in an effort to make it do something against that flourishing. According to them, if you are born with the form of a man, it is doing violence to yourself to attempt to change that form into something else.

There are a lot of arguments why people should be able to be trans if they want. As far as I personally am concerned, I think it's up to them.

But if we want to attack the Christian position we should attack the real position they have. I suspect that the definition you give here, and the obvious problems it presents, would not be relevant to, say, the Pope, who knows what Aquinas wrote as the official dogma of the church.

Then this belief/position is outdated and needs revision. What is the evidence of a persons "true form"?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...165209.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_gonadal_dysgenesis

There is no such thing as "true forum", as intended by ancient philosophy. "True forum" is simply another way of re stating Plato's bad idea of "essence".

Today in modern understanding of life in evolutionary terms is that evolution changes life over millions of years. And even with celestial objects, those things too, do not stay static and change over time.

---

And to Jor.....

This is how he screwed up logic, 

Quote Aquinas, "To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible."

Faith does not require anything but buying. 

"To one without faith, no explanation is possible"

^^^^^ A very self defeating pessimistic view. Fortunately for humans, this has been widely ignored and explanations were later found that didn't involve a super natural gap answer.