(January 1, 2019 at 11:11 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(January 1, 2019 at 10:59 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: Apparently he's too dense to even understand the question.
He was asked to explain "complexity" with respect to ID. He didn't (and can't). OBVIOUSLY no dictionary is going to do that.
They must tell us what is the boundary EXACTLY where things are not complex enough (with examples) to require a designer, and where they become complex enough that they require a designer. They can't. They won't. As such, the concept of "complexity" FOR ID, is undefined.
You're not even on the right question. Was a conversation with someone else.
Again, jumping to conclusions. Bravo.
Oh. So then you answered my question. How about you link to your answers ?
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
