(January 3, 2019 at 9:57 am)Brian37 Wrote:(January 3, 2019 at 9:45 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Have you actually read Aquinas?
Read enough of his apologist fans to know all they are doing is what I said in my prior posts.
Aquinas fan, "Aquinas was a smart man, he believed in same God I do, there for my God is real."
I could care less if we were talking about the book "Evidence That Demands A Verdict" by Josh McDowell
I could care less if it were a Muslim arguing that the Koran matches science. An apology is an apology no matter who is making the attempt or the club they are trying to point you to.
Aquinas was using his status to con himself and others into thinking that constitutes evidence for a Sky Wizard.
But he had far less knowledge about the nature of reality that we have now.
I have read the bible, and not only is it historically spotty at best, it most certainly is throughout scientifically absurd when it comes to the countless fantastic claims it makes. So it really does not matter to me how smart Aquinas was. An apologist is not objective.
Criticizing someone for what they wrote without actually having read it is stupid and ignorant, Brian. You don't get around that with a song and dance.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)