(January 5, 2019 at 6:35 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.
I feel a distinct disconnect.
You ask me for how I use/define a term and I give it to you.
Your reply then seems to indicate... I am not sure what.
You then alude to 'Objective meaning' which, I assume, is your reffering back to a dictionary.
You do understand that a dictionary is only 'Objective' in that you can point to a physical book. With pages, printed words in cogent sentences etc.
Now, two dictionaries of the same printing will be identical and so with the same definitions etc.
But two dictionaries from different publications or different editions will not necessarily agree with one another?
Hence, side by side, the two different publications, they would then fit your useage/definition of 'Subjective'. Since they would 'No longer agree' with each other.
Please. Explain to me how my previous post was not objective?
I can (And have) pointed to the academic research from which I've drawn my words/ideas. Said academic research is, by definition, objective.
How do you actually tell or otherwise determin if another person's posted sentence is actually subjective or objective?
Where is your definition of a diety/god in response/reply?
I've shown you mine. Don't you think its polite to show me yours?
I did show you mine. I'm in agreement with the dictionary. I believe I used Merriam-Webster, so there ya go. Here it is again from M-W:
God
1 capitalized: the supreme or ultimate reality: such as
a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe