(January 7, 2019 at 3:16 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(January 7, 2019 at 3:11 pm)Drich Wrote: I wasn't arguing if you read your response I have been pro this whole time, you are the one who has been arguing. as you just now get how modern word can apply to God. I do how ever have a sneaky feeling you don't understand that men like hawking were/are working on mathematical proof for multi dimensions. I thin to you these are still fringe science words. used to mock and belittle.. You people in 1991 would be proud, however if and when you catch up to the rest of us you will note none of these things are off the table as far as science is now concerned as possible options or future destinations for man himself.. So then why would it be so far fetched God has not already done the same?
Think about it by definition if God is real He would be considered a transdimensional being.. where is heaven? where is hell? not on a map? no. it is a parallel time space/universe outside of this one. Which is not outside the realm of scientific possibility.
Um no D.
It does not work like that, not for any religion. That was then, this is now. Nobody, not Christians, not Muslims, not Jews, not Buddhist or Hindus in antiquity had anything close to the modern scientific knowledge our species has today.
Religions reflect the social norms of the societies they were started in. Holy writings are not scientific method, but merely the bad guesses humans made in antiquity and bought and sold.
ok... so now take religion and see if the scientific terms fit the definition of any religious phenoma or principles. Scientific terminology works both ways like it or not. Meaning religion may not have the terms embedded in it to align with science but the terms used fit the principles being described in the bible.
It's like call a rose by any other name, it doesn't change the way it smells or looks.
