(January 10, 2019 at 8:11 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(January 10, 2019 at 7:52 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: You're assuming yourself as an authority to determine value to things. Why? Who gave you such authority?
How do you know why a pet responds the way they do? Does it have to be specific or can the pet determine their reason for doing so? This very thing happened last night. I was walking one of my dogs and on our way home we went by a glass door. He noticed movement in it from a distance. walked towards it for a moment, I said "come on Max" and we were back home a minute or two later. We didn't need to stop, and no reason to assume he attributed any special consideration for what moved or why it did such.
Not quite sure what you are suggesting I got wrong. Can you clarify? Thanks in advance.
I am not assuming myself as an authority of anything.
You either have evidence or you do not.
Oh did I mention I am dating Angelina Jolie? It's true because she exists and I do as well too.
WHAT? You doubt my claim you say?
See how easy it is to dismiss naked assertions?
Sure you did. To determine evidence of supernatural cognition. Or are you suggesting this wasn't you?
"Sorry, but there has never been any evidence in our species history of a super natural cognition. Certainly lots of claims of countless labels throughout our species history, but no evidence of any."
If you did say this, then we should assume you are the end all in determining evidence of supernatural cognition? I mean you did declare an absolute, so that's a pretty hefty claim in itself.
Aside from that, congrats on dating Angelina Jolie. Send her my regards.
