(January 12, 2019 at 2:12 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(January 12, 2019 at 12:44 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: - What theists? What do you even want demonstrated?
- Science is inclusive of personal beliefs. When you get that, you'll be once step closer to understanding what science is and isn't. Tis why we have various branches of "science."
- What "science" are you suggesting is leading to this conflict? If you feel like something is being rejected due to unfair bias, then feel free to put it out there so we can examine it "scientifically." If something in empirically proven, then it shouldn't be hard to determine which side to lean towards.
No, scientific method is a tool, scientists are people using the tool, like you use a hammer to build a deck(field), house(field), but the hammer is the same.. Scientists are bound by that tool to leave their personal bias out of the lab. You can argue that they don't always do that, and that would be correct. But the tool of scientific method is to weed out personal bias to insure that none of your data, formulas or conclusions get corrupted.
Scientific method is the tool, the scientist is the person is using the tool. If that person wants accurate data, they most certainly have to be willing to accept when they are wrong.
It's a tool developed by a Christian and based on Christian philosophy to establish empiricism.
I figure at this point you're either say "NOOOOO" or your head will explode. Either way it will still be true.
