(October 3, 2011 at 10:45 am)salty Wrote: Nature shows us by the homosexual couple's inability to conceive it is unnatural for them to be together, making the combination wrong. Naturue shows us by the heterosexual's couple's ability to conceive that it is natural for them to be together, making the combination right.
It is human emotion that leads us to the desire to see people happy. We want all people that we love to be happy and to be loved and to love. There nothing wrong with people loving people, but if you put the Biblical persepective aside on sexual matters, you can see that nature pronounces the sexual relationship between a man and a woman correct, and the relationship between same genders incorrect.
Really, whether a heterosexual couple can actually make children does not challenge the argument of if they were "meant" to make children. It is a known fact that a man and woman are needed to procreate children, whether they will do it, is up to them.
Fuck off. Nature in no fucking way suggests homosexuality is 'wrong'. There are literally hundreds if not thousands of examples of animals in nature acting in a homosexual way. Do entire species of animals die off because they can't reproduce because a few of them are queer? Please, get fucking real.
The whole "gays can't have kids" argument is just total bollocks. We aren't discussing how to make babies, we are discussing the love between two people. Letting gay people be gay isn't suddenly going to stop the human race from reproducing is it?
"Really, whether a heterosexual couple can actually make children does not challenge the argument of if they were "meant" to make children. It is a known fact that a man and woman are needed to procreate children, whether they will do it, is up to them."
Why is this relevant?
