(January 15, 2019 at 2:19 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(January 15, 2019 at 11:58 am)pocaracas Wrote: Would you like to do the maths yourself?
Or would you be happy with reading how it's done in a book or a published scientific paper?
I've read numerous scientific papers on it in the past, and I'm happy to read scientific papers on it today. The thing is, it's not just one theory anymore. It's multiple theories that keep changing. That's the problem with human bias. You'll get an increasing number of people saying they have a better explanation. Quite honestly, I appreciate the beauty of personal opinion/bias, but I don't have time to visit everybody's personal take on something. There are many things out there more relevant to my own life, so that's what I try to focus more of my precious time on.
I'm happy to consider the math you're suggesting, but please provide something that is conclusive if you choose to do so. So far I've gotten two different numbers. 85 percent and 95 percent. A 10 percent disparity in the universe's matter is quite a disparity. Also, please keep in mind that I'm not a mathematician. In college I took statistics and classes related to research methods, and as such I understand those aspect of applied mathematics. If the math gets too complex, I may have to defer to a professional who can analyze it more readily.
Of course it's complex... not sure even I can follow it properly, but I'm not the one interested in redoing what they did, so... for a quick fix, this will have to do, and if you wish follow through the references:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model
And you may want to read what these guys say (again, following the references for more info):
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questi...ryonic-mat