DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[pocaracas]

Of course it's complex... not sure even I can follow it properly, but I'm not the one interested in redoing what they did, so... for a quick fix, this will have to do, and if you wish follow through the references:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model

And you may want to read what these guys say (again, following the references for more info):
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questi...ryonic-mat

I read the link for the CDM Model, but these problems still remain -

- It asserts that the CMB is evidence of the BBT, but actually it was the problem.  They didn't find what they predicted (smooth), but rather found something else (lumpy).  That's just putting it simply of course.
- As such, they're using dark matter to prove the BBT without first proving dark matter exists.
- If you can't show it exists, then it makes no sense to say it makes up almost the entire universe.
- This model doesn't state a point, but a rapid appearance.  The original model was a point.  They couldn't establish a point, so I can see why they swapped it out.  But this actually favors creation.

The whole thing doesn't prove, but rather assumes.  When it can prove rather than assume, then it's worth serious consideration.

By your standards, nothing can prove creation either, so creation is also not worth serious consideration. Correct?

The existence of a CMB at all is evidence of the Big Bang.
That the CMB is "lumpy" is evidence that some directions seem to be preferred... what caused that, when the observable cosmos cannot account for it, is what is being labeled as Dark matter and/or dark energy.
The thing is there and its effects are observable.

Just like the electrons are flowing along under your fingertips when you type on your keyboard or smartphone, you can't really see the individual electrons, but you can see their effect.