(January 19, 2019 at 9:11 am)onlinebiker Wrote:Baby Hitler had, presumably, not yet been experimenting with the various drugs he has been said to have taken...a lot.(January 19, 2019 at 3:21 am)Mr.Obvious Wrote: Should just go back and tell m to focus on his art.
If i were sent back in time, and was stuck there with baby hitler in my hands, i don't think i could do it. Could you kill a baby?
You could try to better him, like biker said. But kill? A baby? For something it hasn't done yet? Nor has any concept of?
Pro choice doesn't need such hypothetical situations to defend it either. So don't worry about that.
But if you tell me now you could drown baby hitler, i'm not sure i'd ever want to meet you in real life.
The simplest thing would be to simply grab baby Adolph and take him somewhere else. Igigik Alaska, Berkeley California, Key West Florida. Guarantee he wouldn' t have been the same growing up in any of those places.
Cocaine, speed, opiates, and who knows what else can bend the brain and assist in making a maniac.
If you kill babies for something they might do later in life...there wouldn't be any babies left.
As usual, the extremists are reaching for something, anything, to support their feels on a subject.
