Morality

[Acrobat]

Ultimately, you wondered how moral realism deals with moral disagreement.  Simply, it accepts the existence of moral disagreement.  

Within that, you wondered how a realist would make their moral case.  The same way that they would make any other case about any other thing.  

Beneath that, how one could be in posession of a moral fact.  Observation.

Contained by that "aren't those all like, just their subjective opinions" - Not at all.

---

No you didn’t. I’ll ask you the two simples questions again:

So we'll simply if for, with Yes or No, which you can elaborate on if you choose: 

Calling the holocaust morally bad, is a value judgement. Yes or No?

Values judgements are evaluative proposition, Yes or No?

You already asked for clarification here, and already got it.  Engage with the answer you've been given or fuck off, lol.

See, there you go refusing to answer two simple yes or no questions, for like the 20th time, lol.

I reduced the problem with your claims into two simple questions, that are basically designed to bring your contradictions front and center.

You think by refusing to answer them, that this won’t be obvious, but your refusal does the same thing.

Never seen someone so scared to answer yes or no questions, unless he was worried about incriminating himself, lol.