RE: not mid term, but mid birth abortions.
February 1, 2019 at 11:20 am
(This post was last modified: February 1, 2019 at 11:21 am by Drich.)
(February 1, 2019 at 10:32 am)Brian37 Wrote:(February 1, 2019 at 10:22 am)Drich Wrote: at 9 months during child birth the term is BABY what monster still needs to dehumanize a full developed human baby? Unless it's right to live at that point comes into question. And to answer your question I would let it live even if it were a mix race monster.
^^^^^^ This is what I hate about religion, it teaches you to be judgmental and stick your nose into other people's business where it doesn't belong.
where in the bible does any of this come up outside of you shall not kill or "if one of you even hurts one of these little ones it will better for you never have been born"?
(February 1, 2019 at 11:16 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:(January 31, 2019 at 12:38 pm)Drich Wrote: life threatening pregnancy termination is already a federal allowance. this takes it a step further in that it allows a woman to simply request an abortion even while giving birth.
State law does not trump federal law, if the state law is less specific about the requirements for an abortion, the federal rules apply, in the matter under discussion, that a physician determine that the procedure is medically necessary for the health of the mother or the fetus is dead or not viable. State law on abortion can be more restrictive than federal law up to a point, but it can't allow abortions that are not allowable under federal law.
which is why these states are doing this so it gets revisited nationally.
(February 1, 2019 at 11:20 am)Anomalocaris Wrote:(February 1, 2019 at 11:18 am)Drich Wrote: that's the joke moron.
Indeed, Your are the joke, moron.
