(February 23, 2019 at 12:29 am)fredd bear Wrote: Not sure you mean. Be most interested in your understanding of your claim. I've mad a bet with myself about which philosopher's name You'll drop. Interested to see how right or wrong I am.if
Not gonna drop any names. It came from my own head. Atheism describes a state in which there are no gods, and no consideration they might even be correct or possible. Theism is dismissed as incoherent. IF you have a coherent definition of a *god* present it here, now.
Quote:Your signature claim, unsupported by evidence may simply be dismissed as opinion.
Wrong again. You can take it up with Joseph Campbell. If you are claiming one religion has more truth value than another, it's your job to establish that.
Quote:THAT my friend is an ad hominem attack , not an argument. Again ,to be dismissed due to lack of evidence."
1. I am not your friend, Smilin' Jack.
2. Actually it is not an ad hominem attack. Is is an insult, but it is not what, in Logic, is called an ad hominem.
If you knew any Latin or had an education, you would know that an ad hominem attack is a PERSONAL attack on SOMEONE.
Quote:Let me get this straight: we have never met, yet based on my self description of being an agnostic atheist, you have my philosophical life position all worked out?
Red herring, and strawman fallacies. Nice try there sport. Did I say that ? LOL
Not my problem if you waste your time entertaining incoherent concepts.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist