At work.
Hmmmm.... I don't think it was the incoherence of the subject. Just the lack of specificity.
(February 26, 2019 at 2:50 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Sure, it's fun, you can go down the rabbit hole forever with that one.
I just wanted to stress that attempting to justify the position that some x is incoherent by appealing to a lack of specificity is unproductive no matter what angle you take it from. It's not a valid inference, so any larger position that leans on it inherits that.
Hmmmm.... I don't think it was the incoherence of the subject. Just the lack of specificity.
