What do the conservative Christians here think of Professor Bart Ehrman?

[Drich]

How many times has it actually happened, or how many times have you deluded yourself into believing that it happened because you're an incompetent and narcissistic douche bag?  Those two are not the same thing.  The only person who thinks they are is you, because as noted, you're an incompetent and narcissistic douche bag.  The fact that you still don't understand what it is that I had said and are responding to something I didn't even say is simply the proof that you're a fucking moron.

QED.

Does this peanut  really only have a 4th grade education? His stuff does have that kind of flavour.

That suggests not a lot of reading apart from the bible ,and bible study groups.

I've never understood how the seriously uneducated often boast of the fact.  Plus of course that they have never bothered to go further.,or learned to read for pleasure, and self education..

Such people tend to resent anyone with an education, and are fearfully anti reason and anti science.

I have no idea if peanut is simply not the sharpest tool in the box, or  wilfully ignorant. Of the two,Imo,  ignorance is the worst, because it can be fixed, with effort. 

If I've misunderstood, I'm left confused. Is he simply ignorant/thick on his own merits? If so, he's fair game.  However, I try not to engage with apologists. Their presence on Atheist forums bemuses me; These people insist  on arguing "god did it" to bunch of atheist. This atheist pretty much ignores 'em

0)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Same goes for the dick who tries to argue atheism is a belief, trying to baffle with bullshit.

Me? I'll take my philosopher professor over some fool  on an internet forum who fancies himself a philosopher.. 

I am an agnostic atheist.   That means I do not believe in God. I do not claim to know.. I this is a position, not an argument. I make no claims. Consequently I need demonstrate or prove nothing.   -Claiming such an obligation exists is an attempt to shift the burden of proof.

Taking sophistry apart is  a fun past time, if you have the interest, the time, and are nimble enough intellectually.

If you're serious, perhaps have a look at some Greek sophists first.

was their a question you wish to test you metal with or are you good with stroking your peer's ego hiding behind the assumption that intelligence and or wisdom can come from only one source?

If that is the case my i say I admire how neatly pack you whole world view is. I find it difficult to try and pin hole everything not like me as being of less quality or of less intelligence.. but it seems you have had much practice in putting things in their place... again I applause you for such an effort because it takes one of singular mind with no room for foolsh growth outside of your prescribed lanes of 'e-doctrination' (must be my dyslexia kicking in again miss spelled education) 


Show me what you got..