RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
March 2, 2019 at 6:28 pm
(This post was last modified: March 2, 2019 at 6:31 pm by Amarok.)
(February 23, 2019 at 11:48 am)CDF47 Wrote:No their not and they are wrong about junk DNA as I already proved ages ago on this thread . Seriosly you simply repeat the same debunked crap over and over(February 23, 2019 at 11:00 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Well, CDFs crusade for the holy DNA just took a hit, The DNA alphabet just doubles.
To the long familiar ACGT set of four bases, scientists have added a new synthetic group of four SBPZ.
This makes synthetic DNA literally millions of times more powerful than gods crappy version.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00650-8
Take that, god. I suppose.
It probably adds more complexity, specificity, and functionality.
(February 23, 2019 at 11:47 am)Amarok Wrote: No it freaking doesn't . It doesn't use the scientific method ...PERIOD!!!
Yes, it does and they are testing out the theory and making predictions. Like how they predicted that junk DNA wasnt actually junk and served a purpose which it does.
Quote:The Bible and scientists both agree we come from dust. Even the iron in our blood was once in the core of a star that exploded in a super nova. So, yes, we are mud people.That is a brain dead comparison
Quote: It probably adds more complexity, specificity, and functionality.No it doesn't and your IDiot lexicon of fail is just that
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb
