DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

DNA is evidence that there is no designer.

DNA is a system that along with evolution by natural selection negates the requirement for a designer.
The interactions of random mutations. The causes of which are known to science and chemicals (DNA) which are also known to science, explain all life without requiring any other intervention.
We even have valid and testable ideas of how this came to be abiogenesis.


I do know what CDF will say in response this he will just parrot the same thing he has always done and was told by his pastor , reverend,rabbi, imam or whatever.

But can I just say for this one moment I have posted last and so am winning.

You're so far off on this.

---

We just disagree on DNA proving design and a multiverse.

---

 Yes. We do disagree on how DNA proves design of a Universe.

I know that's not an exact quote... Nor even a close paraphrase BUT your reply CDF47... actually leaves a lot to be desired.

I;m not sure if it's been hedged before but... Is Enligh not your first language?

I know it's my second language (Bad English being my first. ) Or, like me, might you just be a poor speller?

EDIT: Whoah! There's a side step I missed!

So... CDF47... care to explain which of your two statements were incorrect?

This isn't Technical and Professional Communication Class.  I was making a post on an Internet thread using my cell phone.  Every word was spelled correctly.  We disagree that DNA proves design and we also disagree that there is a multiverse.  I believe DNA proves design and the multiverse does not exist.  How is that?  Better for you?

---

Yes, I do know that since new living systems need new (often upgraded) information.

I remember you accepting micro evolution. Could not successive micro steps lead to a macro step that would, afterwards, look as if new information had been added?
Or have you found a mechanism in DNA that prevents such larger changes over many many generations?

The evidence does not suggest that, rather, there are explosions of life in the fossil record.  Study the Cambrian Explosion.

---

Yes, I do know that since new living systems need new (often upgraded) information.

Lol upgrades that's the weak post hoc to explain away macro evolution ever

---

We just disagree on DNA proving design and a multiverse.

No we don't disagreement implies two equally valid positions 

Yours is baseless nonsense pulled out of ID's ass 

Mine is actual science

---

Just following the facts where they lead and those facts aren't always what the TV tells me they are

No you don't you blindly obey ID propagandists and ignore the actual scientists

---

Yes, I can tell the difference.  I know, for instance, that this universe and everything in it is designed.

No you don't you believe on fallacies that it  is

The information includes both more complex species of life and less complex species of life.  New species that are more complex are upgraded species with new information.

Mine is actual science.  

No, I don't.

No, I don't.