DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

Scientists acknowledge we are made of dust. They believe we come from star dust from a super nova explosion billions of years ago. Even the iron in our blood was once at the core of a star billions of years ago. Amazing design.

Yes... Bravo, very poeetic.

Of course, you're ignoring tha actual lines from the book. Y'know? About Man being made 'From dust of the Earth' ?

That vibe?

With pretty much the highest component of the Earth being Silicon and not Carbon.

Still... You keep on doing you CDF47.

Not at work.

We are from the dust of the Earth.

---

Yeah, poof we popped out of the ground containing written codes but it was all through material and chemical means. A creation requires a Creator.

Like Gae said, that's idiotic... and I'd add it shows just how little you understand the actual world around you and prefer there to be some magic sky man who makes those things which you find incomprehensible.
There are many people pouring their intellect into potential ways that abiogenesis can have happened on Earth. There are many ways it may have happened and, even if one of those does succeed in the lab, it is no guarantee that it is the one that actually occurred all those millions of years ago on this planet. Short of using a time machine, we may never know for sure.
But mankind is curious and wants to know of at least a way it could have happened... and the ideas that exist posit that no magic is required... no creator. Just chemistry.
When you look at it, today's DNA does seem to operate on only chemistry, so it makes sense that that's how it began.

They will never find anything without a Creator being necessary.

---

That's probably not entirely true.  Hopefully some lurkers on here seen the truth and know that they are created so they can begin looking into theology for answers.  That is where science leads.

Science leads to theology? Really?.. I would argue that it’s the other way round, given the fact that theology often makes erroneous oversimplifications and then people use science to discover the facts and separate it from the fiction.

In a humorous way..

‘Science is the process we’ve designed in order to generate our best guess as to what the fuck is going on’ - GirlyMan

After the design is proven, theology is the only natural move.

---

I accept the Bible as the Word of God because it says it is and I believe it.

Stupid circular reasoning.

The Quran says it is true. Why do you not believe that?

Contained within are prophecies of the future which came true.

False. You were challenged on this baloney and failed miserably to defend it.

It is unique from all other religions.

False. It is copied from other earlier superstitions.

It states in the beginning God created the heavens and the Earth.

So what? That is a claim. It is unevidenced.

It tells truths about the coming Messiah in the OT which are fulfilled in Jesus in the NT.

False. That is a later retcon the shoehorn jesus into the OT.

He came here perfectlly righteous as God the Son.

Unevidenced claim.

He lead by example and instructed us how to live.

Did he? So you hate figs then?

He will save those that believe in Him.

Repent and believe in Jesus to be saved.  

No thanks, I am not interested in the snake oil you are peddling. All you have really demonstrated is that the crank religion you believe in forces you to become a liar.

There is nothing heritcal I said. I also believe in the Nicene Creed.

Why? It doesn't originate with your god or your jesus or any of the apostles. It originates from men.

---

Well thats a start I guess. When exactly before the 1940s is your ideal time?

You still have not answered this CDF. When exactly was your ideal time? By now you are somewhere back in the 19th century.

In the Quran Allah is known as being the greatest deceiver. I can't follow that.

Prophecies came true. Start studying. The Book of Daniel is a great start for a lot of prophecy.

It is the only religion which claims you can't save yourself. It takes Jesus to save.

There is great proof and evidence of creation.

The OT describes Jesus perfectly.

There is historical evidence of Jesus as I've presented in this thread.

It's not snake oil. It's the truth of creation.

Nicene Creed summarizes things well.

We have been in the last days since the Lord departed Earth so there is no idea time.

---

Scientists acknowledge we are made of dust. They believe we come from star dust from a super nova explosion billions of years ago. Even the iron in our blood was once at the core of a star billions of years ago. Amazing design.

Actually science does not posit ANYWHERE we are "made of dust". You can reference NO scientific peer-reviewed study that concludes that nonsense. "Dust" is not even defined. You never really, ever, studied science did you ? Science does hypothesize that the heavy elements (such as iron) came from supernovae ... but that's NOT EVER in any way (as the Bible says, created in a "garden") which you cherry-pick, when it's convenient. It's not designed. Life evolved and instead of carbon it could be silicon based. Why is that ? How about YOU tell us, and prove you know what you're talking about. DNA as we know it is piss-poor design. Humans have recently made better versions of DNA which carry more information. Your deity is a bad designer. He gave elephants better immune systems that humans. NO ONE here buys your childish ignorant nonsense. No one. And no one care what you believe. You don't even know the HISTORY of how and why writings ("scripture") became a "canon", and what the cultural history is of it being the "word of god", and what that means. You have the knowledge and understanding of a 3rd Grader. You're wasting your time here.

Lol...Then explain to what you know. So far I'm not impressed.

---

I repent my sins to the best of my ability.  I fail all the time as I am a sinful human.  No one could ever live up to what the Lord accomplished in thought, word, and action.

Yes, clearly you're a failure, and god has in turn made it clear what he thinks of you and failures like these.  

It is highly disputed that we descended from monkeys.  The fossil record shows an explosion of life, not a slow gradual process of increasing complexity leading ultimately to humans.  I agree there is micro-evolution and adaptation.

It isn't, you simply would rather not be how the author of creation made you, and on account of that have turned to false prophets, rejecting the work of the lord, your god.  

There is conflicting evidence that we have come from monkeys.  Read or watch videos about Darwin's Doubt by Dr. Meyer.

Testifying in the name of Behe and Meher, lol

We proclaim the gospel as directed by the Lord.  Too bad you have such a poor opinion of us.  We know the truth which you refuse to listen to.

You've been proclaiming the gospel of Behe and Meyer these past 1300 pages.  Are they your lord?

....and this is why jesus doesn't know you, why god won't hear you when you cry out, these are the words by which you condemn yourself. It's not as if magic book didn't warn you that there would be many false prophets who would appear and lead many astray.

You should get right with jesus before it's too late.

The Lord gave us two brilliant scientists that are very knowledgeable. Listening to them is not heresy.