RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
April 2, 2019 at 12:01 pm
(This post was last modified: April 2, 2019 at 12:35 pm by CDF47.)
(April 2, 2019 at 8:21 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.
Uhm..... did you miss post/type CDF47?
"There are no intermediaries that are missing" ?
So.... you're happy with all the fossile evidence we've accrued, then? (With more and more being unearthed all the time?)
Sorry, your reply to myself seems unclear.
i am pleased that we dug up enough fossils to prove my point.
(April 2, 2019 at 8:38 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: IThe difference is I provided plenty of proof and evidence though where you have not. Just because main stream brain washing centers, I mean schools rather, don't have all the answers and don't provide all the information and don't let students know there is a debate about this.
(April 2, 2019 at 1:49 am)CDF47 Wrote:(April 1, 2019 at 8:29 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: I don’t care that you said it’s functional. That’s still a description of a thing; not evidence that the thing couldn’t have arisen from natural processes. If the thing was a tiny fairy that farted out microscopic unicorns, you’d still have to provide evidence for how you determined that it would be impossible for a unicorn farting fairy to come about naturally. You don’t get to just point and say, “but look! It’s a fairy that farts out tiny unicorns! Obviously that thing didn’t come about naturally!”
As I said, if that’s the sum and total of your argument, then it’s the sum and total of mine, and you have no defeators to offer that wouldn’t simultaneously defeat your own: Look around you, CDF. Obviously, all of life on earth is the result of small changes over time accumulating into large ones. It’s just fucking obvious.
Quote:It's not obvious.
Yes, it is. Duh.
Quote:Where are all the failed and successful intermediaries between monkey and man.
Even if that were true, it would be irrelevant to my argument, and yours. You don’t know every detail of every step of god’s mechanism of action for designing and creating life. You just look around and see the big-picture result. If you don’t have to provide every tedious detail of how it was done, then neither do I. If circumstantial evidence is good enough for your argument, then it’s plenty good enough for mine. I can just look at modern apes, and it becomes obvious that we evolved. Scientists agree with me, and the ones that don’t are obviously just peddling a conspiracy.
How does it feel, CDF? Now, imagine I do this for 1,200 pages. You’d be as ready to drink as I am.
JK; I’m always ready to drink.
I use to always be ready to drink as well, LOL. Now I am more of just a social drinker.
Just to clarify, I think there are plenty of good schools but they don't teach all the truth like COINTELPRO or MK Ultra, for instance. They don't teach about secret societies or many other key topics for discussion.
The LORD Exists: http://www.godandscience.org/
Intelligent Design (Short Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVkdQhNdzHU
Intelligent Design (Longer Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzj8iXiVDT8
Intelligent Design (Short Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVkdQhNdzHU
Intelligent Design (Longer Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzj8iXiVDT8