DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

At work.

Uhm... no, that's also not quite true about the whole 'Junk DNA' thing.

However I'm in no way any kind of knowing the finer 'Nuts and bolts' of the issue other than it seems to be a misquoting or representation of what the term actually is and pertains too.

Also, nice side step of Ticktalic there CDF47.

The possible discovery of a pristine site containg specific fossilization of the KT boundry event is another amazing find.

The list goes on.

Want to try your hand at throwing stones at phylogeny? That's a study that's been around even longer than evolution.

All the best mate.

No thanks.

The best to you as well.

---

I wasn't just talking about hobbies.  I was talking about everything including science, engineering, and mathematics.  

Creationists predicted that the junk DNA was not actually junk and they were right, it acts like an operating system.

And do you know what that doesn't do?

Prove creationism.

The definition of junk DNA was that it had no discernable function and indeed there have been many tests carried out on these areas that show that most of those can be disregarded or indeed inserted elsewhere in the genome with no effect.

Some do have an effect and so the classification could change BUT even if all the DNA was functional it would not be evidence for a designer, it would just mean that understanding of DNA would have to change a bit.

So far it is known that approximately 85 - 90 percent of DNA is functional from what I heard.

---

You have not seen the limits of my intellect.  I have many interests.

What limits?  You'd be beat out in an intelligence contest by a goldfish, a dead one.

Please kid.

---

You have not seen the limits of my intellect.  I have many interests.

-but isn't that exactly what I asked you?  Whether this particular thread expressed the limits if your intellect, and..if not...what it would look like if you stepped back took the time and showed us that.

You decided that it did, like a fuckin idiot.

OFC I'm going to conclude that you're an idiot.

Jesus said call no man a fool or be guilty of the judgment.

---

Those are all facts, not just claims.

No, the claims in MY argument were actually the facts. YOURS are just claims. I’m right and you’re wrong. Wow, arguing like you is easy!

Too bad that is not how I argue.  You are just making it out to be that way.

---

You have not seen the limits of my intellect. 

Yes, we really have. Consider, for example, the whole concept of mtEve. You still fail to understand that it is not one woman because you really are that stupid.

I have many interests.

So do I. So what? Did you think that non-sequitur forgave your other failings?

I understand MtEve.