At work.
I did note your list.
I also see other's have offered rebuttals already, so there's that as well.
Plus, it would seem, that your points specifically rest on your premises actually being , y'know, correct..... Or, better yet, 'Real'.
Cheers.
(April 21, 2019 at 5:33 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote:(April 21, 2019 at 5:26 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: Sorry for not quickly quoting your previous G G but.... I really don't think your assertions follow along well from, "If logical reasoning from true premises can never constitute evidence."
Cheers.
Yes, well, I was asked to list a few of them. I was assuming that because I was listing the arguments virtually by title and not by content, that anyone reading it would realize that when talking about logical reasoning from true premises was referring to the content of the actual arguments listed, rather than the list itself, which didn't actually include the content of the argument. Is that a crazy thing to expect?
I did note your list.
I also see other's have offered rebuttals already, so there's that as well.
Plus, it would seem, that your points specifically rest on your premises actually being , y'know, correct..... Or, better yet, 'Real'.
Cheers.