(April 21, 2019 at 5:35 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote:(April 21, 2019 at 5:33 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote: Yes, well, I was asked to list a few of them. I was assuming that because I was listing the arguments virtually by title and not by content, that anyone reading it would realize that when talking about logical reasoning from true premises was referring to the content of the actual arguments listed, rather than the list itself, which didn't actually include the content of the argument. Is that a crazy thing to expect? I didn't realize that each argument's content had to be given in detail. If I did that, would all of the objections and refutations to those objections have to be listed too? I'm expecting genuine engagement...which is I think the biggest problem. My apologies.
(April 21, 2019 at 5:34 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.
Well... I see myself following on along the lines more of Patric Swayze in 'Road house' of "Be nice...... Untill it's time to not be nice."
I just try to be nice. I rarely find times when not being nice is even necessary. After all, we aren't in a bar. We're in a chatroom.
Believing in christardology based on the horse shit you call evidence and logic isn't nice. It's insulting.
The human race, in spite of everything, has come a long way. It deserves better.
I don't know whether I need a bottle in front of me or a frontal lobotomy. 
