I thought your god was keeping you safe

[Guard of Guardians]

If logical reasoning from true premises can never constitute evidence for you, then yes, a lot of evidence would necessarily be off the table, 

Logical reasoning is acceptable, as long as you don't smuggle shit into the arguement .....

I asked you to refute I can walk on water ..... and you failed, that doesn't prove I can walk on water.

Maybe use yours and your friends arugument style can prove I can walk on water ...


1) Whatever falls can be higher (False Premise)  Given gravity, there must be a point of first fall, any higher than which would not fall.  So higher than the point of first fall, that which first falls could not be higher.

2) If there is nothing solid higher then its floating

3) If you can float then you can walk on water

4) Therefore Madog can walk on water

---

At work.

Yes, well, I was asked to list a few of them.  I was assuming that because I was listing the arguments virtually by title and not by content, that anyone reading it would realize that when talking about logical reasoning from true premises was referring to the content of the actual arguments listed, rather than the list itself, which didn't actually include the content of the argument.  Is that a crazy thing to expect?

I did note your list.

I also see other's have offered rebuttals already, so there's that as well.

Plus, it would seem, that your points specifically rest on your premises actually being , y'know, correct..... Or, better yet, 'Real'.

Cheers.

Yeah, look into the arguments.  They've been made and not successfully rebutted today.  It's amazing...

Here's another list by someone I'm sure you're familiar with.  Look into each of the arguments he gives (there are numerous videos for each of the arguments by this specific gentleman).  You can see them done in the classroom and in debate forums where they go unrefuted for years on end.