RE: I thought your god was keeping you safe
April 21, 2019 at 6:48 am
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2019 at 6:52 am by Lemon Curry.)
(April 21, 2019 at 6:30 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote:(April 21, 2019 at 5:37 am)madog Wrote: Logical reasoning is acceptable, as long as you don't smuggle shit into the arguement .....
I asked you to refute I can walk on water ..... and you failed, that doesn't prove I can walk on water.
Maybe use yours and your friends arugument style can prove I can walk on water ...
1) Whatever falls can be higher (False Premise) Given gravity, there must be a point of first fall, any higher than which would not fall. So higher than the point of first fall, that which first falls could not be higher.
2) If there is nothing solid higher then its floating
3) If you can float then you can walk on water
4) Therefore Madog can walk on water
(April 21, 2019 at 5:37 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.
I did note your list.
I also see other's have offered rebuttals already, so there's that as well.
Plus, it would seem, that your points specifically rest on your premises actually being , y'know, correct..... Or, better yet, 'Real'.
Cheers.
Yeah, look into the arguments. They've been made and not successfully rebutted today. It's amazing...
Here's another list by someone I'm sure you're familiar with. Look into each of the arguments he gives (there are numerous videos for each of the arguments by this specific gentleman). You can see them done in the classroom and in debate forums where they go unrefuted for years on end.
So now we are stooping to such lows as co-opting the views of others in support of your argument.
Let's face it christard, you are fast losing this one but don't realise it because you are too dumb.
That's the problem with christards. Too dumb to realise how dumb they really are. Look up Dunning-Kruger, sonny.
Besides, shouldn't you be off to crutch, er church, with mommy and daddy. It is, after all, 'man on a stick day'?
(April 21, 2019 at 6:30 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote:(April 21, 2019 at 5:37 am)madog Wrote: Logical reasoning is acceptable, as long as you don't smuggle shit into the arguement .....
I asked you to refute I can walk on water ..... and you failed, that doesn't prove I can walk on water.
Maybe use yours and your friends arugument style can prove I can walk on water ...
1) Whatever falls can be higher (False Premise) Given gravity, there must be a point of first fall, any higher than which would not fall. So higher than the point of first fall, that which first falls could not be higher.
2) If there is nothing solid higher then its floating
3) If you can float then you can walk on water
4) Therefore Madog can walk on water
(April 21, 2019 at 5:37 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.
I did note your list.
I also see other's have offered rebuttals already, so there's that as well.
Plus, it would seem, that your points specifically rest on your premises actually being , y'know, correct..... Or, better yet, 'Real'.
Cheers.
Yeah, look into the arguments. They've been made and not successfully rebutted today.
Actually, they have been, many, many times before you began spouting your mindless and ill-devised fuckwittery. You are just too stupid to realise.
I don't know whether I need a bottle in front of me or a frontal lobotomy.