(April 21, 2019 at 7:01 am)madog Wrote:(April 21, 2019 at 6:57 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote: Find out!
I DID
The guy is not a geneticist, an ecologist, a biologist, or most importantly, an evolutionary biologist, but a synthetic organic chemist who specializes in nanotechnology? .... what the fuck, its not his field![]()
The guy even admits his views are based on his own biases ... from his website quote :- 'So, in addition to my chemically based scientific resistance to a macroevolutionary proposal, I am also theologically reticent to embrace it'
He is not trained in the field he is trying to discredit other than having theological beliefs .... why not listen to my auntie Mary?
You can pick whatever comments you want and pretend that your aunt Mary's comment on evolutionary biology or the concept of abiogenesis has as much relevance as one of the top scientists in the world whose area of expertise does overlap and include abiogenesis if you want. But it's not going to change the reality. You have a well put together presentation right in front of you that can be easily evaluated on its merits, and you'll go to whatever lengths you have to in order to dismiss it and refuse to deal with it. I get it. I really do. It's just silly and little sad. But it's also very funny, which is the one upside to this conversation. Fingers in the ears, eyes closed, and lah lah lah lah......! I get it.

“I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.” - C.S. Lewis, Is Theology Poetry? -