Deconversion and some doubts

[Acrobat]

ir wouldn’t really matter if it was simply on account of an inner voice that something -is wrong-. You’d still need to add at least one evaluative premise to get -ought not- steal from that inner voice.

It’s a feature of all moral systems, explicit or silent.

Ought not do wrong and stealing is wrong are not identical statements. There’s your evaluative premise. You -do- need to add that if you’re offering a full rational variant of the deontological product.

It doesn’t matter what my inner voice says, x is objectively wrong regardless.

All you seem to be suggesting which flys in the direct opposition to most people’s understanding of morality, is indicating that moral
Statements such as stealing is wrong, are descriptive rather than normative.