Deconversion and some doubts

[Acrobat]

I’m not interested in trying to help you understand your own beliefs as they relate to others. It’s a pointless task, you’re as clever as rock.

I want to hear how a theistic god would be required for moral realism.

Anything else is stalling for time in the absence of that explanation.

According to your description of moral realism, good and bad are purely descriptive and not normative statements, but synonymous with x causes harm. And since according to you moral realism only requires an acceptance of this, no God is required.

There is nothing in this moral realism that you articulated that requires any god, or teleology.

Unlike Vulcans whose moral views require some sort of teleological conception of Good