Deconversion and some doubts

[Acrobat]

The only requirement for moral realism is that moral statements purport to report facts, and do...insomuch as they accurately report the contents of those facts, which refer to the object of the report rather than the subject making the report.

Put simply, moral realisms only requirement is the existence and communication of facts.

Can you explain why any sort of god would be required for human beings to accurately report facts about the object of their report?  

If you can’t, can you explain your petulant initial outburst and subsequent batshit stalling for time?

No God of any type is required to report descriptive facts.

If all moral realism is doing, is providing descriptive facts, then no god of any type is needed for it.