(August 15, 2019 at 12:44 pm)Lek Wrote:Except they didn't experience the same thing according to what you wrote here, you simply retro-fitted it all together.(August 15, 2019 at 11:45 am)Simon Moon Wrote: But I've been here for years, and all we've ever heard from you, is flawed argument after flawed argument, and bad evidence. I am not so sure it is being rude or arrogant to point out when someone is making flawed arguments. Especially when almost everyone here has pointed it out.
If I make a flawed argument and provide bad evidence for one of my beliefs, I love when someone points it out to me. One of my motivations in life is, to hold as many true beliefs as possible, and eliminate as many false beliefs as possible. I care if my beliefs are true or not.
I don't want to beat a dead horse, so I'll say this and leave it alone. I don't call the testimony of three different people who I know well a flawed argument or bad evidence - especially since each saw the same thing at different times.
(August 15, 2019 at 12:44 pm)Lek Wrote: This is in addition to other people who I knew who testified to to similar or other supernatural experiences.As if those unidentified witnesses matter. Could you stand up in court and claim that your anonymous are testimony? Of course not. And you fully realise that such nonsense would be laughed out of court. That is why you avoid it like the plague.
(August 15, 2019 at 12:44 pm)Lek Wrote: If a ghost is not a natural phenomenon,First establish that a "ghost" is an actual phenomenon. Then you would have a start. But you cannot even get to step one.
(August 15, 2019 at 12:44 pm)Lek Wrote: then science doesn't necessarily have the means to determine their existence through scientific processes.What other method do you propose? None at all, we should just take it on faith, right?
(August 15, 2019 at 12:44 pm)Lek Wrote: Why limit yourself to only one avenue to determining the truth?Got another that actually works? sure, you would be the first. Win your Nobel prize, why not
(August 15, 2019 at 12:44 pm)Lek Wrote: I respect the fact that you don't believe it, but I don't limit myself to natural science in my search for truth.You are not interested in truth, only reinforcement of preconceived belief in superstition.
Truth is the last thing you want. Truth interferes with your WOO, and you can't have that happening, can you? Anything which challenges the WOO must be wrong because it is impossible that you are wrong. Isn't that how it goes?