In Defense of a Non-Natural Moral Order

[Acrobat]

You’re offering hilariously incompetent arguments for a straightforward moral position. That’s a significant barrier to the idea, and understanding the idea.

Mostly, you’re doing this because you think that it better explains a mess if question begging assertions convenient to your Christian faith. None of the terms you’re using, however, mean what you think they do.

All in all I’d say that’s s pretty strong objection, lol.

When, instead, you could simply say that we know good and bad like we know circles. That’s non natural realism.

The only position I’m defending is my own, based on my experiences and observation. Whatever terms I’ve used I’ve been explained what I mean by them.

I’ve laid my case out pretty simply and plainly, which can’t be said of a lot of people when speaking about morality.

If you have any actual issues or objection to my argument, please indicate which part, and what your objection is.