In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation?

[Drich]

what book chapter and verse is any of this in?
Are you guys seriously adding straw men material to the story of christ just to have more to say when you try and knock it down? Seriouly look at what you are doing you are literally creating a straw man by telling us what you think was going on in the minds of people you have no way of knowing. THEN you have the juevos to tell me how this is all wrong... what you created is wrong...

Or everything is there yet there and you can't refute how it was written without a big empty sweeping dismissal.

I don't think it needs to be in chapter and verse.  It's simply an alternative, prosaic explanation for one of the myths in the Gospel narrative.

Boru

which is refuted in the whole narrative with the addition of the roman soldiers who's lives depended on Christ being in that tomb. That's what makes it a strawman. 1/3 of the original telling was omitted and this new one put in it's place which makes it easier to believe the 'natural explanation.'