In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation?

[GrandizerII]

Except it isn't established that the claims are grounded in testimony. Even the later Mark 16 addition is really just commentary on the original Mark story.

Even a commentary based on the original is better grounded than what you're offering. Not to mention whatever weaknesses you claim the gospels have, only serves to make your position worse, since your explanation is in reference to the gospels.

What I'm offering is a commentary on the original Mark story. You'll note it doesn't contradict it actually.

Next objection.