(November 13, 2019 at 4:28 pm)Prycejosh1987 Wrote:(September 18, 2019 at 6:41 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: God just told me that you were full of shit.
What...don't believe me?
I think you should use logic when it comes to deciding if god is true or not.
(November 12, 2019 at 3:48 am)desire4hitchasia Wrote: Let me clear today:Now read very carefully dear and never ask this question again because you are going to be satisfied.I think you should ask yourself what evidence you want from god and then sek it. It makes no sense when somebody says prove god exists without asking what evdince they want.
1)If you believe something and don't want to provide evidence then it means you can't prove what you believe.
2)If your being is supernatural and people are asking for natural evidence then it concludes either people are at wrong choice or you.Let if people are asking for wrong choice then burden of proof is over you to explain that how you expert to understand supernatural claims.Let if you are providing the right answer then how your assumptions can't be understood by multi men?
3)If you are impressed with the existence of him why all other people are unable to understand that?Why your belief is not universal in nature?
4)If 5 billions people is evidence then reality should be understood by numerical magnitude?It means that how fermentation occurs in intestine due to undigested diet is understood by mere medical specialists who have not magnitude of 5 billions then is it wrong because majority don't know it?
5)If supernatural evidences can't be proved by natural means then how you can understand supernatural claims by your natural means of inquiry?
I hope you got it.
I’ve stated, many times, the evidence that I require for belief. No one, especially “god” ever produced anything.
Apart from excuses.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"