RE: History Is For Suckers.
November 18, 2019 at 9:08 pm
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2019 at 9:14 pm by redpill.)
(November 17, 2019 at 8:17 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:(November 17, 2019 at 8:00 pm)redpill Wrote: What is it you don't get. Freedom of speech isn't allowed around here. If it were, there wouldn't be rules to follow. Also, I want to discuss what you want me to discuss. But doing so someplace where I could get banned for doing so is pointless.Dude, I've been here for over 9 years, and you've only been here for three days. I think I have more of an idea of what is allowed on the forum than you do. Hell, I think this evasiveness about what you're actually saying is probably closer to ban-worthy than just having really deplorable opinions.
Shove your "opinions" up your ass. All I ever speak about are FACTS! Verifiable facts.
(November 18, 2019 at 5:31 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Quote:What is it you don't get. Freedom of speech isn't allowed around here. If it were, there wouldn't be rules to follow. Also, I want to discuss what you want me to discuss. But doing so someplace where I could get banned for doing so is pointless.
Well, limited freedom of speech is allowed here. Provided you don't break the rules, you can say your say. The simple evidence that you can continue to be an insulting little wretch with all the social graces of a hemorrhoidal badger on PCP should tell you that.
If freedom of speech wasn't allowed here at all, you'd've been banned by now for being a gargantuan cuntflake.
Boru
Limited freedom of speech is the same thing as limited truth. Something only a complete asswipe would promote. Do you want to discuss the truthfulness of my statement? Or do you think I should have thrown dirt on it by putting it more politely. Go fuck yourself moron.
(November 18, 2019 at 6:42 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(November 18, 2019 at 6:17 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote: I read his "book". I can confirm two things. Expressing his ideas here would actually buy him a ban, and he actually is a gargantuan cuntflake.
Well, if he can't express his ideas without breaking the rules, they're probably shite ideas to begin with.
As I said, I got through his first few pages, where he froths indignantly about the Old Testament. He appears to be one of these jumped-up pseudo-intellectuals who doesn't realize that his 'new and groundbreaking' ideas are nothing of the sort.
Boru
Eat shit and die fuckface. I never said that my views on the bible were "groundbreaking." They were simply my views. Stated in my own way.
