RE: Being can come from non-being
December 7, 2019 at 10:16 am
(This post was last modified: December 7, 2019 at 10:19 am by WinterHold.)
There is an argument and it's pretty simple..
Here goes: "how do you build such an opinion in total ignoring of different dimensions that creation in it does not have a clear definition yet?".
Objects can exist in two places at the same time if you managed to see the minimized version of objects. How can you trust that your physics would work in other dimensions?
If we stepped into another dimension or even began to see things "differently" then everything you know, then we can rule out your concept
In a higher dimension even the word "being" and "non-being" would be obsolete.
Here goes: "how do you build such an opinion in total ignoring of different dimensions that creation in it does not have a clear definition yet?".
Objects can exist in two places at the same time if you managed to see the minimized version of objects. How can you trust that your physics would work in other dimensions?
If we stepped into another dimension or even began to see things "differently" then everything you know, then we can rule out your concept
In a higher dimension even the word "being" and "non-being" would be obsolete.