Quote:he historical Jesus is pretty well documented.
No h's not
Quote:I have not heard of any serious historians that refute the existence of Jesus but I’m sure they exist.
Define serious and historians have blind spot when it comes to Jesus
Quote: Along with the historical writings of the individuals you mentioned are the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Those aren't historical and those individuals don't support a historical Jesus
Quote: The writings of these men have been verified by those contemporary historians.
Nope
Quote:No where have I found controversy over his existence by historians of the period.
Yes we have
Quote: That being said, historical data can always be called into question no matter the reputation of the historian.Tue and so
Quote:As for conflating the story of Jesus with King Arthur and Robin Hood...
It's not
Quote:These are stories written hundreds of years after the events depicted and were known at the time as fictional charactersThy wren't
Quote:. Far less writings exist on, say king Arthur and it is widely known that he was a fictional character. In short, your argument is based on a blatant false equivalence.Nope it's spot on
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
